Newick Trees, Proximity Resources and Accessions Analyzing SARSCoV2 Genetic Sequences
While working with SARSCoV2 genetic data in the Wolfram Data Repository, we noticed that there was frequently only a relative handful of differences compared with the overall size of the sequences. This allowed us a number of interesting opportunities for further processing.
First of all, with so much in common, the sequences could be aligned more rapidly by checking for large identical regions and then reducing the alignment task to the sections with differences. Let’s look at an example. First, we’ll gather a BioSequence for the reference SARSCoV2 from a Wolfram Data Repository we maintain for this:
✕

Next, we will arbitrarily pick another SARSCoV2 sequence:
✕

The resource function AlignNearlyIdenticalSequences allows us to find an alignment between these sequences rather quickly:
✕

The alignment itself shows the similarities and differences between the two sequences. Given that these sequences are rather long with broad sections of similarity, it seems helpful to extract just the differences. To accomplish this, we created the resource function AlignmentToPositionDifferences.
AlignmentToPositionDifferences converts an alignment to a list of positions with replacement rules. These can be interpreted as where particular changes might be made in the first sequence to yield the second sequence:
✕

These position differences have many different possible uses. For example, with a number of similar sequences, you might want to align them to a reference. You can then gather the sequences that have similar differences or use them as features in other analyses and potentially combine them with dates or geographic data. A handful of these applications can be seen in the Analysis section at the SARSCoV2 genetics data repository.
Beyond its analytical uses, this is also a great method for compression. Given a reference sequence and a number of variant sequences, we can reduce the size of the variant sequences by nearly an order of magnitude over a raw string representation:
✕

✕

To restore a sequence from these positional differences, we’ve developed the ReconstituteSequenceFromReferenceDifferences resource function. Given the difference and the reference sequence, the function reconstitutes the other sequence:
✕

When working with sequence differences for analysis, there are always two different kinds of possible analysis: where there might be a difference versus where there must be a difference. This occurs because the sequencing process does not always produce exact results about which base is at a particular position. Fortunately, there is a broadly adopted standard for which additional letters are used to represent potential choices among specific bases. These letters are called degenerate letters:
✕

If you’re working with cases where there might be a difference between two sequences, you can use alignment differences directly:
✕

If you’re interested in where they must be different, however, the resource function RemoveDegenerateSequenceDifferences will reduce the differences to those without a degenerate match, eliminating positional differences when no disparity remains:
✕

This is a practical concern, as many SARSCoV2 sequences have a number of degenerate differences with the reference sequence:
✕

When degenerate letter matches are accounted for, the differences are reduced considerably:
✕

Visualizing a DNA Sequence
One common way to visualize DNA and RNA sequences is by using frequency chaos game representation (FCGR). For this purpose, there is the FCGRImage resource function:
✕

Gauging Proximities between Genetic Sequences
Another useful thing to do with a set of genomes is to show them in a way that indicates the relative distances between pairs. We will show two ways to do this. Here we download a set of coronaviruses, which can take up to a minute or so, to see which ones seem closest to SARSCoV2:
✕

Now get the short names and the genome strings:
✕

Use the resource function PhylogeneticTreePlot to create a dendrogram from these sequences:
✕

Another visualization is as a dimensionreduced point set. We use the resource function MultidimensionalScaling (hereafter MDS) for this purpose. First we need to create vectors representing the genome sequences, and then reduce them to three dimensions. There are many ways to do this. We will employ the process used in PhylogeneticTreePlot.
We start by creating the FCGR image data arrays. We use a Fourier discrete cosine transform to remove highfrequency details, then use a common method from principal component analysis (PCA) to get vectors of length 40:
✕

The final step is to use MDS to reduce to 3D:
✕

You’ll see that the SARS and the SARSCoV2 families each cluster closely and both separate well from the various other coronaviruses.
Working with Preexisting Proximity Resources
Throughout COVID19, there has been a number of great analyses with results derived from data not available to the general public. These proximity results include the Newick trees published by Nextstrain. Newick is a format for expressing phylogenetic trees in terms of nested branches with distances. Here is a trivial example shown with an imported result and dendrogram using the ImportNewickString and NewickDendrogram resource functions:
✕

✕

We observe that the nodes b and c are at the same depth, given that they are the same overall distance from the root (4 + 1 and 5, respectively).
This Nextstrain COVID19 data is provided via a link at the bottom of the Nextstrain global page. Once that data is downloaded, it’s ready to be imported:
✕

✕

This tree is too large to display in a single dendrogram. Instead, we can show the tree up to a given level of nesting, truncated recursively from the root:
✕

In this tree, all of the nonstrain nodes are of the form NODE_<number>. If we’d like to look further into the tree, we can find such a node and similarly display a truncated subset of it:
✕

Of course, this is just a small taste of the analysis that is possible for the Newick format or the Nextstrain data and would be a good area for further extension.
Identifiers and Further Information
Accessions and other identifiers are useful for more than gathering their sequences and also offer links to supporting information, such as related PubMed entries:
✕

Sometimes there can be a fair number of these resources:
✕

Supporting Metadata
In addition to providing resources for working directly with sequences, sometimes it is also useful to operate on the metadata for functions. For example, BioSequenceTranslate will accept arguments determining what translation table is used. All of the typical ones are provided through the "GeneticTranslationTable" entities:
✕

These translations are provided in both expansive and terse forms, which are easier to edit and more compact to use, respectively:
✕

✕

You may have occasion, however, to use a custom translation and to want to move between the more expansive and condensed forms as you switch between editing and use. The resource function NCBITranslationTableConvert switches between these formats:
✕

✕

Beyond Genetic Sequences: Protein Sequences
Gene sequences are not the only kind of biomolecular sequence with supporting functionality. The resource function PDBImport allows you to access protein properties and diagrams from the RCSB Protein Data Bank identifier:
✕

An Invitation
The Wolfram Function Repository isn’t only for Wolfram employees; we review and publish submissions by and for our users. One usersubmitted item, DNAAlignmentPlot, produces a nifty plot of the results from sequence alignment:
✕

There is so much more yet to do. If you find yourself with sequence processing functionality that you’d like to share, even if only for your own later convenience, consider submitting it to the Function Repository. We would be delighted to help deliver it to whomever happens to need it.
Get full access to the latest Wolfram Language functionality with a Mathematica 12.3 or WolframOne trial. 
By coincidence of timing, John and I used much of this functionality in a recent Wolfram Community post:
https://community.wolfram.com/groups//m/t/2346172
The goal therein was to analyze sequenced SARSCoV2 genomes from Victoria Australia that are claimed to be of the Kappa variant. We were able to show that they are not quite in the mainstream of Kappa, as they have a few mutations not generally found in Kappa, and lack a few that are in most Kappa samples we used.
Mathematica is such a powerful platform to explore computable biology topics. This is a fantastic blog post showcasing this. Thank you, John & Daniel!
As an educator it is an uphill battle to convince students that Mathematica is relevant for biology when many students are indoctrinated into python and/or R first. The introduction of new core language functions like BioSequence is very welcome and I hope more is coming.
One core algorithm / data structure that Mathematica is missing for modern DNA/RNA sequencing projects is a performant implementation of the FMIndex (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FMindex). This data structure has relevance beyond bioinformatics and might be a worthwhile topic for developer effort.
Thanks again for the great post!