Comments for Wolfram Blog https://blog.wolfram.com:443 News, views, and ideas from the front lines at Wolfram Research. Sun, 23 Aug 2020 13:40:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 Comment on Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) in the Wolfram Language by Joo-Haeng Lee https://blog.wolfram.com:443/2020/08/18/generative-adversarial-networks-gans-in-the-wolfram-language/comment-page-1/#comment-144430 Joo-Haeng Lee Sun, 23 Aug 2020 13:40:57 +0000 https://blog.internal.wolfram.com/?p=68015#comment-144430 I'm playing with synthetic Pokemons generated from the code mentioned above. It works quite well, but never succeeded yet even after 200,000 training rounds. It's good until 60,000 rounds. But, it sometimes crashes to generated totally gray images. I would like to know the full hyper-parameters used for the final results such as max rounds, alternating frequency, etc. Anyway, the post is so helpful! I’m playing with synthetic Pokemons generated from the code mentioned above. It works quite well, but never succeeded yet even after 200,000 training rounds. It’s good until 60,000 rounds. But, it sometimes crashes to generated totally gray images.

I would like to know the full hyper-parameters used for the final results such as max rounds, alternating frequency, etc.

Anyway, the post is so helpful!

]]> Comment on Digital Vintage Sound: Modeling Analog Synthesizers with the Wolfram Language and System Modeler by Joo-Haeng Lee https://blog.wolfram.com:443/2020/07/23/digital-vintage-sound-modeling-analog-synthesizers-with-the-wolfram-language-and-system-modeler/comment-page-1/#comment-144407 Joo-Haeng Lee Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:47:29 +0000 https://blog.internal.wolfram.com/?p=67410#comment-144407 Maybe the coolest project I've ever seen in Wolfram blog. I visited the last year's conference, and the demo was inspiring but not so complete. And, that's something now. Recently, I got a SystemModeler license for robotics and reinforcement learning project. But, this synthesizer comes first thank to you. Thanks! Joo-Haeng Lee Maybe the coolest project I’ve ever seen in Wolfram blog. I visited the last year’s conference, and the demo was inspiring but not so complete. And, that’s something now.

Recently, I got a SystemModeler license for robotics and reinforcement learning project. But, this synthesizer comes first thank to you.

Thanks!

Joo-Haeng Lee

]]> Comment on Learn Linear Algebra in Five Hours Today with the Wolfram Language! by admin https://blog.wolfram.com:443/2020/08/14/learn-linear-algebra-in-five-hours-today-with-the-wolfram-language/comment-page-1/#comment-144399 admin Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:17:49 +0000 https://blog.internal.wolfram.com/?p=67892#comment-144399 Hi Ally, The link is here: https://www.wolfram.com/wolfram-u/introduction-to-linear-algebra/ - Wolfram Blog Team Hi Ally,

The link is here: https://www.wolfram.com/wolfram-u/introduction-to-linear-algebra/

- Wolfram Blog Team

]]> Comment on Learn Linear Algebra in Five Hours Today with the Wolfram Language! by Ally https://blog.wolfram.com:443/2020/08/14/learn-linear-algebra-in-five-hours-today-with-the-wolfram-language/comment-page-1/#comment-144397 Ally Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:01:52 +0000 https://blog.internal.wolfram.com/?p=67892#comment-144397 Hello, I can not find the course. I am trying to access this but there is no clear link.. can you please point me in the right direction? Hello, I can not find the course. I am trying to access this but there is no clear link.. can you please point me in the right direction?

]]> Comment on Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) in the Wolfram Language by Kotaro Okazaki https://blog.wolfram.com:443/2020/08/18/generative-adversarial-networks-gans-in-the-wolfram-language/comment-page-1/#comment-144389 Kotaro Okazaki Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:12:26 +0000 https://blog.internal.wolfram.com/?p=68015#comment-144389 Thank you for your fruitful post on GAN. I will use it as a reference and enjoy GAN by WL. I'm looking forward to adding the new features(more flexible and complicated syntaxes) in the future version. Thank you for your fruitful post on GAN. I will use it as a reference and enjoy GAN by WL.
I’m looking forward to adding the new features(more flexible and complicated syntaxes) in the future version.

]]> Comment on Analyzing Shakespeare’s Texts on the 400th Anniversary of His Death by Linda https://blog.wolfram.com:443/2016/04/21/analyzing-shakespeares-texts-on-the-400th-anniversary-of-his-death/comment-page-1/#comment-144385 Linda Tue, 18 Aug 2020 22:23:54 +0000 https://blog.internal.wolfram.com/?p=30470#comment-144385 Lovely, thanks, it works Lovely, thanks, it works

]]> Comment on Playing Cards with Alice and Bob: Using Secure Multi‑Party Computation and the Wolfram Language to Determine a Winner by Jay https://blog.wolfram.com:443/2020/08/06/alice-and-bob-play-a-game-of-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-144381 Jay Tue, 18 Aug 2020 16:22:08 +0000 https://blog.internal.wolfram.com/?p=67404#comment-144381 W = Wolfram (it better being trusted and trustworthy, otherwise A & B would make a grave mistake using it in the first place) W = Wolfram
(it better being trusted and trustworthy, otherwise A & B would make a grave mistake using it in the first place)

]]> Comment on Analyzing Shakespeare’s Texts on the 400th Anniversary of His Death by admin https://blog.wolfram.com:443/2016/04/21/analyzing-shakespeares-texts-on-the-400th-anniversary-of-his-death/comment-page-1/#comment-144380 admin Tue, 18 Aug 2020 16:19:32 +0000 https://blog.internal.wolfram.com/?p=30470#comment-144380 Linda, You're correct, the snippet of code was removed as it's quite large. I've posted it below to provide clarity. <code>vertexSizes = Normal[Log[ 1.4 + Counts[Flatten[lines]]/ Max[Counts[Flatten[lines]]]]] /. {("All" -> _) -> Nothing, ("Herald" -> _) -> Nothing}; Graph[(edgesReduced /. "All" \[UndirectedEdge] _ -> Nothing), VertexSize -> vertexSizes, VertexLabels -> { "BIANCA" -> Placed[Style["Bianca", Bold, FontSize -> 16], {2.3, -0.4}], "BRABANTIO" -> Placed[Style["Brabantio", Bold, FontSize -> 22], {2.1, -0.8}], "CASSIO" -> Placed[Style["Cassio", Bold, FontSize -> 22], {1, -0.8}], "Clown" -> Placed[Style["Clown", Bold, FontSize -> 16], {2.3, -0.4}], "DESDEMONA" -> Placed[Style["Desdemona", Bold, FontSize -> 20], {0.5, -0.5}], "EMILIA" -> Placed[Style["Emilia", Bold, FontSize -> 22], {2.2, -0.4}], "GRATIANO" -> Placed[Style["Gratiano", Bold, FontSize -> 16], {2.3, -0.6}], "IAGO" -> Placed[Style["Iago", Bold, FontSize -> 22], {1.7, 0}], "LODOVICO" -> Placed[Style["Lodovico", Bold, FontSize -> 22], {1.2, -0.9}], "MONTANO" -> Placed[Style["Montano", Bold, FontSize -> 16], {1.6, -0.6}], "OTHELLO" -> Placed[Style["Othello", Bold, FontSize -> 28], {0.6, 1.5}], "RODERIGO" -> Placed[Style["Roderigo", Bold, FontSize -> 22], {.2, -1}], "DUKE OF VENICE" -> Placed[Style["Duke of Venice", Bold, FontSize -> 16], Above], "Fourth Gentleman" -> Placed[Style["Fourth Gentleman", Bold, FontSize -> 14], {-1., 1.7}] }, VertexLabelStyle -> Directive[Bold, FontSize -> 14], VertexStyle -> {"OTHELLO" -> RGBColor[1, 0.84, 0, 0.75], "BRABANTIO" -> RGBColor[0.79, 0.38, 0, 0.63], "DESDEMONA" -> RGBColor[0.73, 0.09, 0.89, 0.65], "LODOVICO" -> RGBColor[0.28026441037696703`, 0.715, 0.62, 0.88], "IAGO" -> RGBColor[0.363898, 0.71, 0.91, 0.85], "RODERIGO" -> RGBColor[0.571589, 0.79, 0., 0.71], "CASSIO" -> RGBColor[0.14, 0.15, 0.81, 0.65], "EMILIA" -> RGBColor[1., 0.29, 0.76, 0.68]}, EdgeStyle -> Gray, GraphStyle -> "BasicGray", ImageSize -> 1200]</code> - Wolfram Blog Team Linda,

You’re correct, the snippet of code was removed as it’s quite large. I’ve posted it below to provide clarity.

vertexSizes =
Normal[Log[
1.4 + Counts[Flatten[lines]]/
Max[Counts[Flatten[lines]]]]] /. {("All" -> _) ->
Nothing, ("Herald" -> _) -> Nothing};
Graph[(edgesReduced /. "All" \[UndirectedEdge] _ -> Nothing),
VertexSize -> vertexSizes, VertexLabels -> {
"BIANCA" ->
Placed[Style["Bianca", Bold, FontSize -> 16], {2.3, -0.4}],
"BRABANTIO" ->
Placed[Style["Brabantio", Bold, FontSize -> 22], {2.1, -0.8}],
"CASSIO" ->
Placed[Style["Cassio", Bold, FontSize -> 22], {1, -0.8}],
"Clown" ->
Placed[Style["Clown", Bold, FontSize -> 16], {2.3, -0.4}],
"DESDEMONA" ->
Placed[Style["Desdemona", Bold, FontSize -> 20], {0.5, -0.5}],
"EMILIA" ->
Placed[Style["Emilia", Bold, FontSize -> 22], {2.2, -0.4}],
"GRATIANO" ->
Placed[Style["Gratiano", Bold, FontSize -> 16], {2.3, -0.6}],
"IAGO" -> Placed[Style["Iago", Bold, FontSize -> 22], {1.7, 0}],
"LODOVICO" ->
Placed[Style["Lodovico", Bold, FontSize -> 22], {1.2, -0.9}],
"MONTANO" ->
Placed[Style["Montano", Bold, FontSize -> 16], {1.6, -0.6}],
"OTHELLO" ->
Placed[Style["Othello", Bold, FontSize -> 28], {0.6, 1.5}],
"RODERIGO" ->
Placed[Style["Roderigo", Bold, FontSize -> 22], {.2, -1}],
"DUKE OF VENICE" ->
Placed[Style["Duke of Venice", Bold, FontSize -> 16], Above],
"Fourth Gentleman" ->
Placed[Style["Fourth Gentleman", Bold, FontSize -> 14], {-1., 1.7}]
}, VertexLabelStyle -> Directive[Bold, FontSize -> 14],
VertexStyle -> {"OTHELLO" -> RGBColor[1, 0.84, 0, 0.75],
"BRABANTIO" -> RGBColor[0.79, 0.38, 0, 0.63],
"DESDEMONA" -> RGBColor[0.73, 0.09, 0.89, 0.65],
"LODOVICO" -> RGBColor[0.28026441037696703`, 0.715, 0.62, 0.88],
"IAGO" -> RGBColor[0.363898, 0.71, 0.91, 0.85],
"RODERIGO" -> RGBColor[0.571589, 0.79, 0., 0.71],
"CASSIO" -> RGBColor[0.14, 0.15, 0.81, 0.65],
"EMILIA" -> RGBColor[1., 0.29, 0.76, 0.68]}, EdgeStyle -> Gray,
GraphStyle -> "BasicGray", ImageSize -> 1200]

- Wolfram Blog Team

]]> Comment on Playing Cards with Alice and Bob: Using Secure Multi‑Party Computation and the Wolfram Language to Determine a Winner by Arnoud Buzing https://blog.wolfram.com:443/2020/08/06/alice-and-bob-play-a-game-of-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-144379 Arnoud Buzing Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:09:47 +0000 https://blog.internal.wolfram.com/?p=67404#comment-144379 If I understand you correctly, you are suggesting adding a third person to the equation? This would also work but then this is no longer the same algorithm. It introduces the problem of who "W" is. Can "W" be trusted? Is "W" a spy for either Alice or Bob? Does "W" always tell the truth? And so on. This would be interesting to explore in another blog post perhaps! If I understand you correctly, you are suggesting adding a third person to the equation? This would also work but then this is no longer the same algorithm. It introduces the problem of who “W” is. Can “W” be trusted? Is “W” a spy for either Alice or Bob? Does “W” always tell the truth? And so on. This would be interesting to explore in another blog post perhaps!

]]> Comment on Playing Cards with Alice and Bob: Using Secure Multi‑Party Computation and the Wolfram Language to Determine a Winner by Jay https://blog.wolfram.com:443/2020/08/06/alice-and-bob-play-a-game-of-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-144376 Jay Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:35:50 +0000 https://blog.internal.wolfram.com/?p=67404#comment-144376 I understand it is a showcase, so, kudos to Wolfram - however, would this have worked for A & B as well (from their point of secrecy): they each pick a card (as per above) and those two cards are compared by W, simply returning the 'winner' (without disclosing any actual values): so, A = 12, B = 9 - W returns: 'A' (wins). The point being, W being capable of processing those 2 values in a second step, without actually showing them (meaning, they are allocated to variables). I understand it is a showcase, so, kudos to Wolfram – however, would this have worked for A & B as well (from their point of secrecy): they each pick a card (as per above) and those two cards are compared by W, simply returning the ‘winner’ (without disclosing any actual values): so, A = 12, B = 9 – W returns: ‘A’ (wins).
The point being, W being capable of processing those 2 values in a second step, without actually showing them (meaning, they are allocated to variables).

]]>